<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citigroup Considering Reverse Stock Split</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mullooly.net/citigroup-considering-reverse-stock-split/774/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mullooly.net/citigroup-considering-reverse-stock-split/774</link>
	<description>NJ Fee Only Investment Advisor, providing guidance for your 401k account.    Mullooly Asset is a fee-only alternative to stockbrokers and financial planners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analysts love it. So why is the stock going down?</title>
		<link>http://www.mullooly.net/citigroup-considering-reverse-stock-split/774/comment-page-1#comment-9767</link>
		<dc:creator>Analysts love it. So why is the stock going down?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mullooly.net/?p=774#comment-9767</guid>
		<description>[...] didn&#8217;t we buy GE at $7?&#8221; &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t we buy Citibank at practically zero?&#8221; &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t we&#8230;blah blah [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] didn&#8217;t we buy GE at $7?&#8221; &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t we buy Citibank at practically zero?&#8221; &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t we&#8230;blah blah [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

