bernard madoff

SIPC and Bernard Madoff

by Thomas Mullooly on December 19, 2008

Is the SIPC responsible for helping Madoff clients?

The Securities Investor Protection Corporation (also known as SIPC) maintains a special reserve fund — authorized by Congress — to help investors who had accounts and brokerage firms that failed.

Technically, when a brokerage firm fails, and owes customers cash and securities that are missing from customer accounts, SIPC usually gets involved.  Keep in mind: Bernard Madoff’s securities firm did not fail.  His investment advisory practice turned out to be a fraud.

SIPC does not work like the FDIC.  Protection for investment fraud does not exist in the United States.  And since SIPC has a reserve of just over $1 billion, there is simply no way it would be able to compensate all victims in the event of loss due to investment fraud.  The focus of SIPC is very narrow… SIPC was created to help restore funds to investors dealing with bankrupt and otherwise financially troubled brokerage firms.  Not fraud.

I’m not a lawyer and don’t pretend to give legal advice.  But it seems to me that if some of the money was restored to the investors who were wiped out through Madoff, then that *could* prevent them from taking a catastrophic loss against their taxes.  As I’ve noted in another post, taking a catastrophic loss against income might actually be more valuable for some individuals.  But only after consulting with a tax advisor will they know the right answer.

On a related note: the clients who lost money were (technically) clients of Madoff’s investment advisory firm — not the brokerage firm.  That point is somewhat confusing.  Keep in mind that Madoff ran a brokerage firm (which was a member of SIPC) — and also ran an investment advisory firm (which was not a member of SIPC).  It seems a bit of a reach to claim that investors lost money through Madoff’s brokerage firm.

You can read more about SIPC at their website.
You can read about the SIPC and Bernard Madoff here.

If You Found This Article Helpful, We Have A Free Report We’d Like To Share With You:

3 Questions You Should Ask Your Money Manager TODAY. 

(simply include your name and email to get the report,
along with market updates from Mullooly Asset Management)

{ 0 comments }

Made Off Theft (Madoff)

by Thomas Mullooly on December 19, 2008

The federal, state and local governments are co–losers with Madoff investors.

Lots of questions are starting to surface regarding Bernard Madoff, and the scam that he’s been running — apparently, for years.

I’m starting to read questions like “not charging an advisory fee, only working for the commissions…isn’t that a conflict of interest?” Of course it is — and no investment advisor would ever (or should ever) work under terms like that.

Another question that’s being asked is “when did this actually stop being an investment program and start becoming a Ponzi scheme?” Until all the details are in, I think people need to assume this has been a Ponzi scheme…all along… from the very beginning.

One more question being asked (which I addressed earlier) is “how can one person run a scheme like this — on this magnitude, and for this length of time — without anyone else being involved, or aware of it?” Of course.  We should all be skeptical.

Another red flag (and how could so many smart people miss this one?): how was it that no dividends were ever reported?  Sometimes you wind up holding a stock through the dividend — by accident!  And not one dividend was reported…ever?

The topic I raised on several blog posts elsewhere, took a different slant from the “shock and surprise” many commenters posted.  My point was this: it’s probably a safe assumption that people paid ordinary income and capital gains on fictitious transactions — in many cases, for years.  We’re talking about a tremendous amount of taxes being recouped by investors who can file amended returns.

Taking that concept one step further: let’s assume that everything was fictitious — the statements, the trades, the returns — everything.  What we’re really looking at is not losses, but… theft.

I’ve heard that theft losses can be written off entirely against your income.  I’m not an accountant, and don’t give tax advice.  Let’s put this in perspective: if you lose money in the stock market, you “net” your gains and losses and can take a maximum of $3000 capital loss each year.  The remainder gets carried forward into the future, until it is completely used up.

However, if you lost $1 million, due to theft, you can write off the entire $1 million as a loss against your income.  And if that wipes out your entire net income for the current year, you can go back the last three years and amend those tax returns — and then carry the remainder forward — until is used up.

Will investors be made whole?  No.  No chance.

Under this scenario, the federal, state and local governments are the co–losers with Madoff investors.  And who will make up the deficit caused by this?

You got it.

If You Found This Article Helpful, We Have A Free Report We’d Like To Share With You:

3 Questions You Should Ask Your Money Manager TODAY. 

(simply include your name and email to get the report,
along with market updates from Mullooly Asset Management)

{ 1 comment }

Bernard Madoff: Made off with the money

December 13, 2008

Former NASDAQ chairman Bernard Madoff disclosed this week that the investment advisory firm he has run (aside from his market making business) was, in fact a fraud.  It’s unknown exactly how much money has been lost, but it appears to be somewhere between $17 billion and $50 billion. By comparison, think about the money being [...]

Read the full article →