Lehman Brothers

Bank Stocks Point and Figure Analysis January 2012

by Thomas Mullooly on January 30, 2012

How healthy are the big banks? No one knows the details, but we can get a pretty good idea of what investors think of banks, by simply looking at the point and figure charts in this sector. In fact, we can look at the entire banking sector, the entire financial sector (not just banks) — and the relative strength of these sectors. It’s a worthwhile look!

Point And Figure ChartWe close this video with the grand-daddy of all financial sector charts: Lehman Brothers from 2008.

If you’ve got a mutual fund, exchange traded fund or a stock you would like us to ANALYZE, get in touch w/us! You can find Mullooly Asset on the web, or you can call us at 732-223-9000. We would be happy to review a chart for you and maybe even make a video of it. I would also add the following:

Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Changes in investment strategies, contributions, or withdrawals may materially alter the performance of your portfolio. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will either be suitable or profitable for an investor’s portfolio.

If you are relying on a blog post for specific investment advice, you are making a huge mistake. Please speak with an investment adviser before making ANY investment decisions.

If you do not have an investment adviser, we encourage you to contact Mullooly Asset Management at 732-223-9000, or through our website. Under no circumstances should the content discussed here to be considered specific investment advice.

If You Found This Article Helpful, We Have A Free Report We’d Like To Share With You:

3 Questions You Should Ask Your Money Manager TODAY. 

(simply include your name and email to get the report,
along with market updates from Mullooly Asset Management)

{ 0 comments }

Big Changes Ahead for Oil?

by Thomas Mullooly on March 27, 2010

We saw a pretty significant signal recently from the oil sector.   A relative strength sell signal.

This does not mean oil immediately becomes a terrible place to have money at work in March or April 2010.

But longer term, it suggests oil will (likely) under-perform the overall markets.  And, it’s possible the sector could significantly under-perform.

This is really important, in more than one way.

First, let me walk you through another example where a sector gave a relative strength sell signal. The Financial sector gave a relative strength sell signal in April 2007.  Think about that.  That signal came before any of the mortgage stocks melted, well before Bear Stearns imploded (like nearly a year before that event) and significantly (18 months) before Lehman Brothers collapsed. And long before things like “sub-prime mortgages” and “TARP” became household terms.

And since “financial companies” were the largest component of the S&P 500 (at the time), it was a pretty serious signal for the whole market.

What was even MORE significant was that April 2007 was the first time that chart had flashed a relative strength sell signal…period.

Sure, some financial stocks rallied – and were even good trades AFTER the relative strength sell signal in April 2007.  But those gains were fleeting, and most were only short term trades.   You were trying to swim upstream in downward environment.

What relative strength charts can tell us is which areas will out-perform (or under-perform) their peers (or the whole market). And relative strength signals tend to last (on average) about two years.

Relative strength is not a trading tool.

So, oil, as a sector, has now given a relative strength sell signal. This is important because as the market has improved over the past year we’ve seen some common characteristics: as oil prices climbed, the dollar fell.  Are these two actions mutually exclusive?  Probably not.  However, in some ways, in the last twelve months oil became a proxy for inflation – and for the markets overall.  We saw areas rich in natural resources (like Latin America) perform really well over the past 12 months.

And now, in the last few weeks, we’ve seen the dollar strengthen (somewhat), we’ve seen emerging markets slow down (again, somewhat) and the price per barrel of oil has leveled off around the high 70′s-low 80′s area.

This does not imply oil will collapse with absolute certainty.  After all, the market generally looks pretty virile.  It also does not mean we will absolutely see Lehman-style collapses in the area either.  But never say never.

This is the first relative strength sell signal the oil sector has given, dating all the way back into the 1990′s.

This is one big reason why I have stopped buying in the oil patch and the emerging markets.  These areas were “hot to trot” a year ago.   Now, I am more skeptical about investing in these areas. Too many times, investors will look at “what did the best last year” and blindly stick their 401k money there, or invest in the hot mutual fund of 2009.  Last year’s superstars may become this year’s (or next year’s) duds.

Be careful!  Again, this signal could foreshadow conditions that may not appear for a few months, or even a year.  Or not at all. The sector could just stall.  But I’d rather be early, than a minute late.

If You Found This Article Helpful, We Have A Free Report We’d Like To Share With You:

3 Questions You Should Ask Your Money Manager TODAY. 

(simply include your name and email to get the report,
along with market updates from Mullooly Asset Management)

{ 0 comments }

Jim Cramer: Exposed

March 13, 2009

Someone is actually holding Jim Cramer responsible for some of the advice he has given, and also for the fact that CNBC has “morphed” into an entertainment channel.

Read the full article →

Revisiting Mark to the Market

February 15, 2009

What is left in the governments bag of tricks to get the banks back on track?  One topic that I wrote about — 5 months ago — has popped up this past week with more and more frequency.  We are finally starting to hear more and more chatter about relaxing “Mark to the market” regulations. [...]

Read the full article →

Mark to the Market: what is it?

October 2, 2008

Quick history lesson: Mark-to-the-Market was a practice originally begun by futures and commodity traders in the 19th century.  Essentially, mark-to-the-market means your holdings must be “priced” every night…at the price they can be sold at. For years, many bank and investment companies carried investments at cost, or even sometimes at the face value.  This never [...]

Read the full article →

Who’ll Save Lehman?

September 13, 2008

That was the headline I found over at CBS Marketwatch.  As usual, the news media is whipping (anyone who will read) into a frenzy about Lehman Brothers.  More news may be forthcoming about Lehman — between the time I finish writing this and the time you read this. I have no idea what’s going to [...]

Read the full article →

Lehman: Going Private?

July 17, 2008

In the coming months and years, you will hear more publicly traded companies than ever before discussing the idea of GOING PRIVATE.  Even with the mortgage mess, there is STILL access to capital. Management often gets fed up trying to build long term businesses and gain market share on a long term basis, while struggling [...]

Read the full article →

Goldman Stearns and Lehman Sachs

March 22, 2008

All these firms hold the same investments. There is STILL considerable risk in the group. Why did this happen to just Bear Stearns? One of the first things I learned about investments was when it comes to bonds, think chocolate and vanilla, super simple: when interest rates rise, bond prices (values) go down. And when [...]

Read the full article →